![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpMKZjz1dMOS4vJwUwGzEfuYniR8kzCP9mYn7GdIeuEODUMHma4oX6x2SjmXFJrhQdamHBck6sCqPVEzAGCIvk5xh4jy0swDVNIom2yquKIN7gywamz39yJBEZ6oQxZu51XxC1JAjRDw/s280/Poppy-flowers-30709686-2048-1536.jpg)
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
"Death, be not proud" by John Donne
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpMKZjz1dMOS4vJwUwGzEfuYniR8kzCP9mYn7GdIeuEODUMHma4oX6x2SjmXFJrhQdamHBck6sCqPVEzAGCIvk5xh4jy0swDVNIom2yquKIN7gywamz39yJBEZ6oQxZu51XxC1JAjRDw/s280/Poppy-flowers-30709686-2048-1536.jpg)
"That Time of Year" by William Shakespeare
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifVPeaS3kfvKYDwzGcT29IkAK7nta6FfmI0lW63xasIcRwVpQkW0yYw8PNiXCjr7g0Yxejp3zqcRfYU4drsWLr5OTWseCnWBaU3CJR2EDsUuZMDXQWDyr5ky7LGKAqAb0282tVt-KkOg/s280/beach%2520dying%2520fire.jpg)
"Crossing the Bar" by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
“Crossing
the Bar,” a poem by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, creates two sets of figures within
the poem. The first of these is “sunset and evening star,” and the second set
is “twilight and evening bell.” Both of these sets are used to portray
approaching death. The idea of the poem is crossing into another world after
death, which is exemplified through Tennyson’s use of sea and sailor imagery. In
the first set, the precise moment of death occurs when Tennyson states, “When I
put out to sea,” (Tennyson, 886). Through this phrase, the author successfully
portrays embarking on a journey; going out into the sea. The moment of death in the second set occurs with
the line, “When I embark,” (Tennyson, 886). This statement quite clearly
explains the journey after life into another world. When one “embarks” from
earth, their soul has moved on to another place, which Tennyson portrays
through his poem. The narrator of the poem expresses a desire to see his pilot,
and the capitalization of the word pilot and the prior knowledge that the poem
involves death suggests that the Pilot is synonymous to God. Through these
sets, Tennyson effectively portrays the journey to life after death.
"A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner
The short story "A Rose for
Emily," authored by William Faulkner, takes an interesting turn when a
decomposed body was discovered in the house of the main character Emily. The
man is presumed to be Homer Baron, a homosexual man who had previously been a possible
husband for her, and this brings up the idea that Emily killed him. However,
her reason for this never stated. It is likely though that Emily was motivated
by her fear of change and her desire to preserve the past. Past events
including Emily’s refusal to accept her father’s death and her refusal to both
pay taxes and get a house number support this fear. By murdering Homer Baron,
Emily ensured that he would never leave her, which because of his homosexuality
he was considering. Emily even continued to live as though Homer was her
husband, treating the corpse as though he was simple sleeping. The first person
plural narrator mentions, “Then we noticed that in the second pillow was the
indentation of a head,” (Faulkner, 289). Emily’s total detachment from the
present day is reflected through these details. Terrified of being abandoned,
she did everything in her power to avoid losing what she knew. Unfortunately,
this included Homer Baron.
"The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson
“The Lottery,” a short story by author Shirley Jackson, focuses on a theme of great importance, what can happen when tradition is not questioned in society. The way something has always been done is not necessarily the most appropriate way with how times have changed, and this story is an example of this fault. The idea of “The Lottery” is that every year, one member of the community is stoned to death, simply because it is tradition. One of the characters, Old Man Warner, states in the story, “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon,” (Jackson, 268). This quote was an old saying that the townspeople had used in the past as a reason for the barbaric lottery. They saw the lottery as some sort of ritual to bring in a bountiful harvest. However, during the present time of the story, this explanation is no longer applicable. It is even stated that many of the aspects of the ritual had been disregarded over the years, with only the stoning remaining. This proves that there really was no reason for the lottery other than tradition. Furthermore, many of the surrounding towns, the northern town specifically mentioned, had done away with the lottery, only further emphasizing the fact that it was not necessary. As the lottery was unjustly and barbarically killing an innocent person every year, the theme of the importance of questioning tradition is well explained.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
The Glass Menagerie: Absent Amanda
After
reading The Glass Menagerie, a play
by Tennessee Williams, I noticed the presence of dramatic irony in the Scene
Seven of the play. In the final encounter between Amanda and her son Tom,
Amanda yells at him for once again avoiding the family and going to the movies.
She yells, “You don’t know things anywhere! You live in a dream; you
manufacture illusions!” (Williams, 1288). This statement is terribly ironic, as
Amanda was the character who consistently created her own illusions throughout
the entire play. Although Tom did write poetry and wish to escape his
overbearing mother, he did not lose himself in the past like Amanda, who devoted
her time to childhood memories. Tom wished to create a better future for
himself, where he could make his own decisions and escape the ditch he was
stuck in. Furthermore, Tom’s dream is proven to not be an illusion, as he does
leave his mother and his sister in search of a better life. However, Amanda is
still trying to live vicariously through her daughter Laura, dreaming up the
gentlemen callers that flocked to her door during her youth. These flashbacks
to the past prove that the character who is really living in a dream and
manufacturing illusions is Amanda.
The Glass Menagerie: Ordinary O'Connor
In
Scene Six of The Glass Menagerie,
written by Tennessee Williams, the readers are finally introduced to the long
awaited gentleman caller of the play, Jim O’Connor. In the character
descriptions, Jim is characterized as “a nice, ordinary, young man,” (Williams,
1234). Furthermore, Tom, the narrator, continues to describe Jim as “the most
realistic character in the play, being an emissary from a world of reality that
we were somehow set apart from,” (Williams, 1236). When Jim does call on the
Wingfield family, these characteristics shine through. Although Amanda is
overbearing and showy, Jim proves his kind personality by laughing at her jokes
and paying attention to her. Furthermore, although Laura is incredibly shy and
awkward, Jim spends time with her and even encourages her to branch out and
break through her introversion. Jim also has formed a friendship with Tom at
the warehouse where they both work, even though Tom is considered strange by
others because of his love for poetry. Although some people might be put off by
the Wingfield family, Jim O’Connor embraces them. Unlike the Wingfields, Jim is
also what one might call ordinary. He has a stable job that he works hard at,
he is engaged to an equally ordinary girl, he is friendly, and most people like
him. However, Jim is also described as the most realistic character. His
realism shines through many of the characteristics with which he was described.
While Amanda is lost in her past, Laura is lost within herself, and Tom is lost
in his desire to escape, Jim is happy with the situation he is in and completes
his daily tasks without complaint. The fact that Jim goes through an everyday
schedule proves his realism, as most people today live their lives on a
schedule. They go to work, do their errands, and have a family, and Jim
embodies this person perfectly. His realism is contrasted with that of the
Wingfields, where each family member lives in their own world on a day to day
basis.
The Glass Menagerie: Shattered Sister
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1bpJ8MuIekK7qhiTfj2zpZr3e9WbM6kVvbqchjDTSOFs0r5IW7h4y9Oqag4tezUz5nrGAl7ZjeXc-Gk9pyVhVk_gQ9EuwdkCHBTScEXAmY8G7vu5pxXRRBucy_JuhttV8TgwpP00TEg/s1600/Unicorn.jpg)
The Glass Menagerie: The Fleeing Father
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnlzH79ZJKQr87pEcbltcUPH-RQfHg2XHnPI96PKc-N5fZ88xVZMf8qJHlPA80cw87FvfNJ6g4fCYIPRBvB0ybwkc4XIkia35r1-fYaixhkF6gH4Wtp3618phq5byL4W-ne9sE-dr3sQ/s280/coffin.jpg)
The Glass Menagerie: Sensational Stage Directions
After reading The Glass
Menagerie, a play written by Tennessee Williams, something that became apparent
to me was the importance of the stage directions. Although stage directions are
always beneficial so that actors and directors know what the author imagined,
the stage directions of The Glass Menagerie take it a step further. These stage
directions help explain the story, answer questions, and portray the symbolism
of certain objects. One object the stage directions especially help come to
life is the portrait of the father of the Wingfield family. Though the stage
directions, the reader learns what happened to the father, why he is not
physically present in the story, and the effect he has had on the other
characters. In the stage directions, the father in the portrait is described as
“gallantly smiling, ineluctably smiling, as if to say, ‘I will be smiling forever,’”
(Williams, 1235). As the reader later learns, the father had escaped the family
years before in hopes of a better life, explaining the description of “smiling
forever.” Furthermore, the stage directions further explain the symbolism
between Laura and her glass collection. When one of her pieces breaks, the
stage directions describe Laura as having been wounded simultaneously. This
description of a person being wounded from a piece of glass shattering portrays
the connection Laura has to the glass and the similarities she feels towards
her little figures.